Share your CCIE v5 Written Experience

Hey, i would also like to see it 🙂

sezam101 @ gmail.com

@Anonymous

Dashboard (Horizon): The GUI for administrators and users to access, provision, and automate resources. The dashboard is based on Python Django framework and is layered on top of service APIs. Logging in relies on Keystone for identity management which secures access to the GUI. The dashboard supports different tenants (business units, groups/teams, customers, etc) with separate permissions and credentials; this is effectively role-based access control. The GUI provides the most basic/common functionality for users without needing CLI access, which is supported for advanced functions. “Security group” abstractions to enforce access control (often need to configure this before being able to access the new instances).

@Siberia Goodwin

Agreed 100% on your comments about that mailing list as well as the spam links getting posted.

As IT professionals studying for CCIE , I really hope you guys are using a sandboxed browser when clicking on links you don’t know is safe or not.. especially when looking for dumps or pirated software (i.e. cracked VCE players).

Passed Today – 890 using the PCL 119 updated dump that was posted here prior. There are several answers that were incorrect on the dump as people have mentioned so I validated each question/answer and took the test this morning. There were maybe 5 questions total that were not from the PCL dump including 2 drag and drops that were not there. One of the DnDs was Radius vs TACACS and the other was an IPV6 one that I never saw before.

Those who wish to “SPOTO 133Q DUMP” should add their own mail address under the following mailing list and should post.
If you saw this post and you have “SPOTO 133Q DUMP”, please share it.
Thank you.
Compliance with the notation rules.(xxxxx @ yyyyy)
h1740mm @ gmail.com
shijut24 @ gmail.com
satya.maruth @ gmail.com
orowp1 @gmail.com
kamalrajshan @ gmail com
chriswarfreak050697 @ gmail.com
adjustmss @ gmail.com
bahador_gheisari @ yahoo.com
peter_mak @ yahoo.com
tutrij @ gmail.com
empno2000 @ yahoo.com
1529890217 @ qq.com
sanpay1984 @ gmail.com
smartfix123 @ gmail.com
dorocoll77 @ gmail.com
trullybonga @ yahoo.com
tonykozier44567 @ gmail.com
charles.white64 @ gmx.com
mmacbe79 @ gmail.com
beulsins_sonny@yahoo. fr
ayagaya88 @ gmail.com
chat2rajkumar@ rediffmail.com
F77777f_2004 @hotmail.com
jradnor93 @ gmail.com
mandirooz33 @ yahoo.com
alfredyyyy8 @ gmail.com
deskbucks @ gmail.com
arabicuser @ hotmail.com
idealgur2 @ gmail.com
nguyentan1980 @ gmail.com
hrt7778 @ yahoo.com

@Steve GRATZ!!! and thaks for your comments

Hello. I should retake the exam this weekend. Please share spoto 120q or 133q.

Thanks for your sharing in advance.

tomas.alice.2000 @ gmail.com

@Steve

Thanks for the feedback! Good to know that PCL is enough.

please share latest valid SPOTO for 400-101
attarhmn @ y a h o o. com

@Elestar

The answer is Keystone. Neutro and Horizon and other projects can all use RBAC but Keystone is the framework for its implementation and functionality:

OpenStack uses a role based access control (RBAC) mechanism to manage accesses to its resources. With the current architecture, users’ roles granted on each project and domain are stored into Keystone, and can be updated through Keystone’s API. However, policy enforcement (actually allowing or not the access to resources according to a user’s roles) is performed independently in each service, based on the rules defined in each policy.json file.

http://www.florentflament.com/blog/customizing-openstack-rbac-policies.html

@People using the PCL dump

I’m seeing that people are using the PCL 109Q when you should be using the updated PCL 119Q.

https://mega.nz/#!IGJmQbLL!uVi20wIKeoGL7ryT8VqKt8gHvyx4SRdgP3DeYPM2qTs

This link is to the PCL 119Q version.

-CCIE Kam

@CCIE Kam but everyone says that we need both PCL190 & PCL119 =S

@Shikima

I haven’t heard anyone saying PCL190 is needed. I don’t even know if that file exists. I HAVE heard that PCL119 + PL270 is enough.

@Shikima

People within the last 2 weeks are not reporting anything about PCL190 so I wouldn’t believe that. I haven’t even seen PCL190. What i AM hearing is that PCL119 + PL270 is enough to pass the exam.

@STEVE

CONGRAS…!!!

ALL ANS.ARE CORRECT IN PL119???

@STEVE

CONGRAS…!!!

ALL ANS IN PL119 Q ARE CORRECT???

Which two statements about IGMP filtering are true?

A It eliminates the need for a multicast RP.
B It can be implemented on Layer-3 routed ports using the ip igmp access-list command.
C It allows Anycast RP to operate within a single AS.
D It supports IGMPv3 traffic only.
E It can be implemented on Layer-2 switchports using IGMP profiles.

————————————————————————————–

I think that E is correct. But I don’t know the other correct options.

Low possibility of correct answer: AD

Option B is confusing： ip igmp access-list ?????

R1(config)#int e0/0
R1(config-if)#ip igmp ?
access-group IGMP group access group <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<This is not the "ip igmp access-list"
explicit-tracking Enable/Disable IGMP explicit-tracking
helper-address IGMP helper address
immediate-leave Leave groups immediately without sending last
member query, use for one host network only
join-group IGMP join multicast group
last-member-query-count IGMP last member query count
last-member-query-interval IGMP last member query interval
limit IGMP limit
mroute-proxy Mroute to IGMP proxy
proxy-service Enable IGMP mroute proxy service
querier-timeout IGMP previous querier timeout
query-interval IGMP host query interval
query-max-response-time IGMP max query response value
static-group IGMP static multicast group
tcn IGMP TCN configuration
unidirectional-link IGMP unidirectional link multicast routing
v3-query-max-response-time IGMP v3 max query response value
v3lite Enable/disable IGMPv3 Lite
version IGMP version

Someone please advise me.

@ Joe

I am certain you are correct. The command is access-group, not list. IGMP can definitely be at layer 2 through a profile. I would go with C as the other answer if I came across this question.

C It allows Anycast RP to operate within a single AS.
E It can be implemented on Layer-2 switchports using IGMP profiles.

I feel that these are the most accurate. I am less confident about C, however I can say that B and D are most certainly false, and I can’t find a whole lot remotely involving A either.

@Joe

C and E are what I would go with. D is straight wrong, B is wrong because it should be access-group, and A seems irrelevant in concept.

E is certainly correct, which makes D wrong.
C is likely correct, but I can’t find anything definitively saying so.

B is wrong since the command would be IP IGMP PROFILE
D it seems unrelated to SSM
it’s E indeed

Switch(config-if)# ip igmp filter profile number

Would you share your DUMP my friend ? 🙂 clementduval2000 at hotmail.com

I’d be glad to study with you even !

i pass exam with spoto 133Q dumps
thank for spoto
http://cciers.spoto.net

where can i get spoto dumps

@CCIE Kam My bad, it’s PL270

Hi All,

Please find SPOTO dump approx 210 q, most of the questions are matching to Passleader.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ahi3fezf2n5c4ac/Spoto.pdf?dl=0

@Joe where u get that question?

Hi All

Please find below spoto dump approx 210 q. Most of the questions are matching to passleader.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ahi3fezf2n5c4ac/Spoto.pdf?dl=0

@AK
Old Spoto dump,not valid any more !!!

Old Spoto dump,not valid any more !!!

Old Spoto dump,not valid any more !!!

I think rstut has an issue !

@Majesty & Anonymous
Which one (SPOTO) is valid? please advise and how I can get it.??

@Majesty & Anonymous

Which one (SPOTO) is valid. Please advise and how Can I get it.
Can you please share me on attarhmn @ y a hoo .com

SPOTO history

136Q → 212Q(also 210Q) → 120Q → latest 133Q(120Q+13Q)

SPOTO history
136Q → 212Q(also 210Q) → 120Q → latest 133Q(120Q+13Q)

Can some one share spoto 120Q or 133Q, Please
arabicuser @ hotmail.com
Best,

hi guys.
spoto dumps is still the most efficient .
also spoto updates every track on their websites.
someoe can visist below link:
http://cciers.spoto.net

@Steve
There are 2 new drag and drops and 3 new questions !!!
Could you provide us these 2 new drag and drops and 3 new questions ???? please !!!
Thanks

SPOTO create a record that 7 spoto students pass ccie lab on one day.

@ CCIE @Joe @Anonymous @clement

B: NO
Filtering by IGMP group or channel is configurable on a Layer 3 SVI as a default filter for all ports in access mode under that SVI
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12-2SX/configuration/guide/book/igmpfilt.html

C:For me No
Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP) is the key protocol that makes Anycast RP possible, MSDP was developed for peering between Internet service providers (ISPs)
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/solutions_docs/ip_multicast/White_papers/anycast.html#wp1029310

D: MAYBE
Memo: IGMPv3 with 1 membership report can have multiple groups
IGMP Filtering, in IGMPv1 – IGMPv2 the only filtering can do is permit or deny but in IGMPv3 can change the body

@ CCIE @Joe @Anonymous @clement

B: For me no
Filtering by IGMP group or channel is configurable on a Layer 3 SVI as a default filter for all ports in access mode under that SVI
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12-2SX/configuration/guide/book/igmpfilt.html

C:For me No
Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP) is the key protocol that makes Anycast RP possible, MSDP was developed for peering between Internet service providers (ISPs)
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/solutions_docs/ip_multicast/White_papers/anycast.html#wp1029310

D: MAYBE
Memo: IGMPv3 with 1 membership report can have multiple groups
IGMP Filtering, in IGMPv1 – IGMPv2 the only filtering can do is permit or deny but in IGMPv3 can change the body

@ CCIE @Joe @Anonymous @clement
B: NO
Filtering by IGMP group or channel is configurable on a Layer 3 SVI as a default filter for all ports in access mode under that SVI
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12-2SX/configuration/guide/book/igmpfilt.html
C:For me No
Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP) is the key protocol that makes Anycast RP possible, MSDP was developed for peering between Internet service providers (ISPs)
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/solutions_docs/ip_multicast/White_papers/anycast.html#wp1029310
D: MAYBE
Memo: IGMPv3 with 1 membership report can have multiple groups
IGMP Filtering, in IGMPv1 – IGMPv2 the only filtering can do is permit or deny but in IGMPv3 can change the body

@ CCIE @Joe @Anonymous @clement

B NO
Filtering by IGMP group or channel is configurable on a Layer 3 SVI as a default filter for all ports in access mode under that SVI
cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12-2SX/configuration/guide/book/igmpfilt.html

C For me No
Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP) is the key protocol that makes Anycast RP possible, MSDP was developed for peering between Internet service providers (ISPs)
cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/solutions_docs/ip_multicast/White_papers/anycast.html#wp1029310

D MAYBE
Memo: IGMPv3 with 1 membership report can have multiple groups
IGMP Filtering, in IGMPv1 – IGMPv2 the only filtering can do is permit or deny but in IGMPv3 can change the body

Guys sry for the Spam

@EVERYONE

PLZ SHARE LATEST SPOTO DUMPS

THANKS

IGMP filtering is like an ACL and is used only to preserve the table populated from the igmp snooping
DE

@Anonymous @Joe
The dump is full of typos, what is the real question isn’t B) igmp access-list but B) igmp access-group ?

If the choice is indeed “access-list” then it’s wrong, but on another side ACL=access-group, swhen one talk about access-list, and access-group command it’s more or less equal (you configure one with the other).

Also, D filtering does not apply only to IGMPv3, simply with v1/v2 the IGMP packets would be discarded. Then the discussion is around the meaning of “filter” : selectively tune the content, or also allow/permit.
Is discarding not filtering ?
On the context of the question and the struggle B vs E, then maybe not, so maybe the answer is D indeed. maybe.

“When an IGMP packet is received, IGMP filtering uses the filters configured by the user to determine
whether the IGMP packet should be discarded or allowed to be processed by the existing IGMP snooping
code. With a IGMP version 1 or version 2 packet, the entire packet is discarded. With a IGMPv3 packet,
the packet is rewritten to remove message elements that were denied by the filters.”

source: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12-2SX/configuration/guide/book/igmpfilt.pdf

Has anyone tried this? >> http://www.exam-labs.com/exam/400-101?
I wonder if they are up-to-date, although 995Q is a lot to cover.

guy should visit spoto website
http://cciers.spoto.net

@Joe @CCIE @Anonymous @clement @Anonymous @Soul

Good Good guys

now we know about IGMP filtering

@Joe

next question?

@PJ
http://www.exam-labs.com/exam/400-101?

This site is free and they are updating, premium for 15.99 lifetime.
What I like about this site is that questions and answer with explanation to the answers.

Its a good read plus its free.