Share your CCIE v5 Written Experience

Those who wish to “SPOTO 120Q DUMP” should add their own mail address under the following mailing list and should post.
If you saw this post and you have “SPOTO 120Q DUMP”, please share it.
Thank you.
Compliance with the notation rules.(xxxxx @ yyyyy)
h1740mm @ gmail.com
shijut24 @ gmail.com
satya.maruth @ gmail.com
kamalrajshan @ gmail com
chriswarfreak050697 @ gmail.com
adjustmss @ gmail.com
bahador_gheisari @ yahoo.com
peter_mak @ yahoo.com
tutrij @ gmail.com
empno2000 @ yahoo.com
1529890217 @ qq.com
sanpay1984 @ gmail.com
smartfix123 @ gmail.com
dorocoll77 @ gmail.com
trullybonga @ yahoo.com
tonykozier44567 @ gmail.com
charles.white64 @ gmx.com
mmacbe79 @ gmail.com
beulsins_sonny@yahoo. fr
ayagaya88 @ gmail.com
chat2rajkumar@ rediffmail.com
F77777f_2004 @hotmail.com
jradnor93 @ gmail.com

Guys, who has updated lab info

@ Legend

Just a heads up I haven’t seen any lab discussions on this thread, most likely because this particular thread is “Share your CCIE v5 Written Experience.” If you do find a good lab resource let us know 🙂

-CCIE Kam

Can someone send me the latest spoto 120q to {email not allowed}

Thanks

Can someone send me the latest spoto 120q to moll.breger @ gmail.com

Can someone send me the latest spoto 120q to molly.breger @ gmail.com

@ PeterMak

The answer to your question is “Reflexive ACLs”

Reference document http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ios-firewall/23602-confaccesslists.html (do a search on “upper-layer” and you will see the answer)

-CCIE Kam

All CCIE security guys , I found this link where somebody shared ccie security written file . But it has less than 100 questions and he claimed he has passed written exam 400-251 v 5 using the same pdf file contents . I’m still doubtful , can anybody confirm
http://certcollection.org/forum/topic/310425-ccie-security-written-file-cracked-successfully/

any one have dunp please send me on ahmadghalaini at hotmail

guys , please also look at this site for preparation of ccie security written exams and also please verify it . https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/0B-ob6L_QjGLpd3JLalNVS0VWbms
your comments will be helpful for us to clear this exams. thanks.

@ CCIE Kam

thanks for the heads up. I appreciate it. I will keep looking and if I find one, I will let you know.

@ CIE*SP I think there is another site for CCIE security
http://www.securitytut.com/ccie-security-written/share-your-ccie-security-written-experience

Which statement about a type 4 LSA in OSPF is true?
A. It is an LSA that is originated by an ASBR, that is flooded throughout the AS, and that describes a route to the ASBR
B. It is an LSA that is originated by an ABR, that is flooded throughout the area, and that describes a route to the ASBR
C. It is an LSA that is originated by an ABR, that is flooded throughout the AS, and that describes a route to the ABR
D. It is an LSA that is originated by an ASBR, that is flooded throughout the area, and that describes a route to the ASBR
E. It is an LSA that is originated by an ABR, that is flooded throughout the AS, and that describes a route to the ASBR

NOTES: This is a very poorly worded question or someone is trying to be very tricky.

Answers are obviously B or E (ABR orginates it and it’s for route to ASBR). However, is this flooded throughout AS OR throughout the area?

Problem is that it is flooded through the AS (Answer E), except for stub areas, which technically makes this choice wrong.

The other choice B is not fully correct either as it says throughout THE area, making it one area (usually Backbone), but LSA 4 is flooded throughout all regular areas (except for special/stub areas).

IF PRESSED, I’m choosing A, but not sure what the correct one is.

Thoughts ……

***** CORRECTION
IF PRESSED, I’m choosing B <<<<<<<<

Those who wish to “SPOTO 120Q DUMP” should add their own mail address under the following mailing list and should post.
If you saw this post and you have “SPOTO 133Q DUMP”, please share it.
Thank you.
Compliance with the notation rules.(xxxxx @ yyyyy)
h1740mm @ gmail.com
shijut24 @ gmail.com
satya.maruth @ gmail.com
kamalrajshan @ gmail com
chriswarfreak050697 @ gmail.com
adjustmss @ gmail.com
bahador_gheisari @ yahoo.com
peter_mak @ yahoo.com
tutrij @ gmail.com
empno2000 @ yahoo.com
1529890217 @ qq.com
sanpay1984 @ gmail.com
smartfix123 @ gmail.com
dorocoll77 @ gmail.com
trullybonga @ yahoo.com
tonykozier44567 @ gmail.com
charles.white64 @ gmx.com
mmacbe79 @ gmail.com
beulsins_sonny@yahoo. fr
ayagaya88 @ gmail.com
chat2rajkumar@ rediffmail.com
F77777f_2004 @hotmail.com
jradnor93 @ gmail.com

@CCIE KAM,

I replied to your email sir, please check.

hi guys
the thread is not only written but also lab preparation.
i really suggest guy should visit their website and will find both written and lab report.
http://cciers.spoto.net

Those who wish to “SPOTO 120Q DUMP” should add their own mail address under the following mailing list and should post.
If you saw this post and you have “SPOTO 133Q DUMP”, please share it.
Thank you.
Compliance with the notation rules.(xxxxx @ yyyyy)
la.andrew @ gmail.com
h1740mm @ gmail.com
shijut24 @ gmail.com
satya.maruth @ gmail.com
kamalrajshan @ gmail com
chriswarfreak050697 @ gmail.com
adjustmss @ gmail.com
bahador_gheisari @ yahoo.com
peter_mak @ yahoo.com
tutrij @ gmail.com
empno2000 @ yahoo.com
1529890217 @ qq.com
sanpay1984 @ gmail.com
smartfix123 @ gmail.com
dorocoll77 @ gmail.com
trullybonga @ yahoo.com
tonykozier44567 @ gmail.com
charles.white64 @ gmx.com
mmacbe79 @ gmail.com
beulsins_sonny@yahoo. fr
ayagaya88 @ gmail.com
chat2rajkumar@ rediffmail.com
F77777f_2004 @hotmail.com
jradnor93 @ gmail.com

Those who wish to “SPOTO 120Q DUMP” should add their own mail address under the following mailing list and should post.
If you saw this post and you have “SPOTO 133Q DUMP”, please share it.
Thank you.
Compliance with the notation rules.(xxxxx @ yyyyy)
la.andrew @ gmail.com
h1740mm @ gmail.com
shijut24 @ gmail.com
satya.maruth @ gmail.com
kamalrajshan @ gmail com
chriswarfreak050697 @ gmail.com
adjustmss @ gmail.com
bahador_gheisari @ yahoo.com
peter_mak @ yahoo.com
tutrij @ gmail.com
empno2000 @ yahoo.com
1529890217 @ qq.com
sanpay1984 @ gmail.com
smartfix123 @ gmail.com
dorocoll77 @ gmail.com
trullybonga @ yahoo.com
tonykozier44567 @ gmail.com
charles.white64 @ gmx.com
mmacbe79 @ gmail.com
beulsins_sonny@yahoo. fr
ayagaya88 @ gmail.com
chat2rajkumar@ rediffmail.com
F77777f_2004 @hotmail.com
jradnor93 @ gmail.com
mandirooz33 @ yahoo.com

Those who wish to “SPOTO 120Q DUMP” should add their own mail address under the following mailing list and should post.
If you saw this post and you have “SPOTO 133Q DUMP”, please share it.
Thank you.
Compliance with the notation rules.(xxxxx @ yyyyy)
la.andrew @ gmail.com
h1740mm @ gmail.com
shijut24 @ gmail.com
satya.maruth @ gmail.com
kamalrajshan @ gmail com
chriswarfreak050697 @ gmail.com
adjustmss @ gmail.com
bahador_gheisari @ yahoo.com
peter_mak @ yahoo.com
tutrij @ gmail.com
empno2000 @ yahoo.com
1529890217 @ qq.com
sanpay1984 @ gmail.com
smartfix123 @ gmail.com
dorocoll77 @ gmail.com
trullybonga @ yahoo.com
tonykozier44567 @ gmail.com
charles.white64 @ gmx.com
mmacbe79 @ gmail.com
beulsins_sonny@yahoo. fr
ayagaya88 @ gmail.com
chat2rajkumar@ rediffmail.com
F77777f_2004 @hotmail.com
jradnor93 @ gmail.com
mandirooz33 @ yahoo.com
alfredyyyy8 @ gmail.com

one guy pass exam with spoto dumps within one day.
so ,it confirms spoto dumps is very valid.
guys can enquire with spoto agents.
http://cciers.spoto.net

Those who wish to “SPOTO 133Q DUMP” should add their own mail address under the following mailing list and should post.
If you saw this post and you have “SPOTO 133Q DUMP”, please share it.
Thank you.
Compliance with the notation rules.(xxxxx @ yyyyy)
h1740mm @ gmail.com
shijut24 @ gmail.com
satya.maruth @ gmail.com
kamalrajshan @ gmail com
chriswarfreak050697 @ gmail.com
adjustmss @ gmail.com
bahador_gheisari @ yahoo.com
peter_mak @ yahoo.com
tutrij @ gmail.com
empno2000 @ yahoo.com
1529890217 @ qq.com
sanpay1984 @ gmail.com
smartfix123 @ gmail.com
dorocoll77 @ gmail.com
trullybonga @ yahoo.com
tonykozier44567 @ gmail.com
charles.white64 @ gmx.com
mmacbe79 @ gmail.com
beulsins_sonny@yahoo. fr
ayagaya88 @ gmail.com
chat2rajkumar@ rediffmail.com
F77777f_2004 @hotmail.com
jradnor93 @ gmail.com
mandirooz33 @ yahoo.com
alfredyyyy8 @ gmail.com

Which OpenStack component implement role-based access control ?
all the dumps answered wrong …. the right answer is —> HORIZON

Can anyone tell me if the drag and drops in spoto 119 were valid?

Those who wish to “SPOTO 120Q DUMP” should add their own mail address under the following mailing list and should post.
If you saw this post and you have “SPOTO 133Q DUMP”, please share it.
Thank you.
Compliance with the notation rules.(xxxxx @ yyyyy)
la.andrew @ gmail.com
h1740mm @ gmail.com
shijut24 @ gmail.com
satya.maruth @ gmail.com
kamalrajshan @ gmail com
chriswarfreak050697 @ gmail.com
adjustmss @ gmail.com
bahador_gheisari @ yahoo.com
peter_mak @ yahoo.com
tutrij @ gmail.com
empno2000 @ yahoo.com
1529890217 @ qq.com
sanpay1984 @ gmail.com
smartfix123 @ gmail.com
dorocoll77 @ gmail.com
trullybonga @ yahoo.com
tonykozier44567 @ gmail.com
charles.white64 @ gmx.com
mmacbe79 @ gmail.com
beulsins_sonny@yahoo. fr
ayagaya88 @ gmail.com
chat2rajkumar@ rediffmail.com
F77777f_2004 @hotmail.com
jradnor93 @ gmail.com
mandirooz33 @ yahoo.com
alfredyyyy8 @ gmail.com
deskbucks @ gmail.com

Those who wish to “SPOTO 120Q DUMP” should add their own mail address under the following mailing list and should post.
If you saw this post and you have “SPOTO 133Q DUMP”, please share it.
Thank you.
Compliance with the notation rules.(xxxxx @ yyyyy)
la.andrew @ gmail.com
h1740mm @ gmail.com
shijut24 @ gmail.com
satya.maruth @ gmail.com
kamalrajshan @ gmail com
chriswarfreak050697 @ gmail.com
adjustmss @ gmail.com
bahador_gheisari @ yahoo.com
peter_mak @ yahoo.com
tutrij @ gmail.com
empno2000 @ yahoo.com
1529890217 @ qq.com
sanpay1984 @ gmail.com
smartfix123 @ gmail.com
dorocoll77 @ gmail.com
trullybonga @ yahoo.com
tonykozier44567 @ gmail.com
charles.white64 @ gmx.com
mmacbe79 @ gmail.com
beulsins_sonny@yahoo. fr
ayagaya88 @ gmail.com
chat2rajkumar@ rediffmail.com
orowp1@ gmail.com
F77777f_2004 @hotmail.com
jradnor93 @ gmail.com
mandirooz33 @ yahoo.com
alfredyyyy8 @ gmail.com
deskbucks @ gmail.com

please share with me SPOTO 133Q dump at

ahmadsiddiqui7784 @ gmail.com

Which two statements about DMVPN are true?(Choose two)
A. It is a tunnel-less VPN technology
B. It uses automatic IPSec triggering to build IPSec tunnels
C. It is an open standard
D. It supports multicast and QoS within tunnels
E. It provides a routable interface for terminating IPSec tunnels
F. It allows both the hub and the spokes to use dynamic IP addresses

BD OR BE

guys can directly visit spoto website first:
http://cciers.spoto.net

Those who wish to “SPOTO 120Q DUMP” should add their own mail address under the following mailing list and should post.
If you saw this post and you have “SPOTO 133Q DUMP”, please share it.
Thank you.
Compliance with the notation rules.(xxxxx @ yyyyy)
la.andrew @ gmail.com
h1740mm @ gmail.com
shijut24 @ gmail.com
satya.maruth @ gmail.com
kamalrajshan @ gmail com
chriswarfreak050697 @ gmail.com
adjustmss @ gmail.com
bahador_gheisari @ yahoo.com
peter_mak @ yahoo.com
tutrij @ gmail.com
empno2000 @ yahoo.com
1529890217 @ qq.com
sanpay1984 @ gmail.com
smartfix123 @ gmail.com
dorocoll77 @ gmail.com
trullybonga @ yahoo.com
tonykozier44567 @ gmail.com
charles.white64 @ gmx.com
mmacbe79 @ gmail.com
beulsins_sonny@yahoo. fr
ayagaya88 @ gmail.com
chat2rajkumar@ rediffmail.com
orowp1@ gmail.com
F77777f_2004 @hotmail.com
jradnor93 @ gmail.com
mandirooz33 @ yahoo.com
alfredyyyy8 @ gmail.com
deskbucks @ gmail.com
{email not allowed}

please share with me “SPOTO 120Q” and “SPOTO 133Q” dump …!
{email not allowed}

Please share Spoto 120Q
arabicuser @ hotmail.com

please share with me “SPOTO 120Q” and “SPOTO 133Q” dump …!
idealgur2 @ gmail.com

please share me SPOTO 120Q DUMP

nguyentan1980 @ gmail.com

Those who wish to “SPOTO 133Q DUMP” should add their own mail address under the following mailing list and should post.
If you saw this post and you have “SPOTO 133Q DUMP”, please share it.
Thank you.
Compliance with the notation rules.(xxxxx @ yyyyy)
h1740mm @ gmail.com
shijut24 @ gmail.com
satya.maruth @ gmail.com
kamalrajshan @ gmail com
chriswarfreak050697 @ gmail.com
adjustmss @ gmail.com
bahador_gheisari @ yahoo.com
peter_mak @ yahoo.com
tutrij @ gmail.com
empno2000 @ yahoo.com
1529890217 @ qq.com
sanpay1984 @ gmail.com
smartfix123 @ gmail.com
dorocoll77 @ gmail.com
trullybonga @ yahoo.com
tonykozier44567 @ gmail.com
charles.white64 @ gmx.com
mmacbe79 @ gmail.com
beulsins_sonny@yahoo. fr
ayagaya88 @ gmail.com
chat2rajkumar@ rediffmail.com
F77777f_2004 @hotmail.com
jradnor93 @ gmail.com
mandirooz33 @ yahoo.com
alfredyyyy8 @ gmail.com
deskbucks @ gmail.com
arabicuser @ hotmail.com
idealgur2 @ gmail.com
nguyentan1980 @ gmail.com

Which two statements about IGMP filtering are true?

A It eliminates the need for a multicast RP.
B It can be implemented on Layer-3 routed ports using the ip igmp access-list command.
C It allows Anycast RP to operate within a single AS.
D It supports IGMPv3 traffic only.
E It can be implemented on Layer-2 switchports using IGMP profiles.

————————————————————————————–

I think that E is correct. But I don’t know the other correct options.

Low possibility of correct answer: AD

Option B is confusing： ip igmp access-list ?????

R1(config)#int e0/0
R1(config-if)#ip igmp ?
access-group IGMP group access group <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<This is not the "ip igmp access-list"
explicit-tracking Enable/Disable IGMP explicit-tracking
helper-address IGMP helper address
immediate-leave Leave groups immediately without sending last
member query, use for one host network only
join-group IGMP join multicast group
last-member-query-count IGMP last member query count
last-member-query-interval IGMP last member query interval
limit IGMP limit
mroute-proxy Mroute to IGMP proxy
proxy-service Enable IGMP mroute proxy service
querier-timeout IGMP previous querier timeout
query-interval IGMP host query interval
query-max-response-time IGMP max query response value
static-group IGMP static multicast group
tcn IGMP TCN configuration
unidirectional-link IGMP unidirectional link multicast routing
v3-query-max-response-time IGMP v3 max query response value
v3lite Enable/disable IGMPv3 Lite
version IGMP version

Someone please advise me.

@Elestar

Keystone provides the mechanism for configuring role based access control (RBAC) thoughout the OpenStack

https://www.openstack.org/videos/video/advances-in-keystones-role-based-access-control

Which two actions can you take to prevent routes from becoming stuck in
active?(Choose two.)
A: Manually increse the EIGRP metrics on interfaces connected to successors.
B: Increase the EIGRP K values on low-bandwidth interfaces
C: Increase the time a router waits before it declares routes stuck in active.
D: Design the network so that it uses the lowest possible number of queriess.
E:Use port channeling to aggregate multiple EIGRP interfaces.
F:Increase the Hello timers on EIGRP interfaces.

Dump says CD.
D is obviously correct.
I dont like C because its not really a solution to the problem but its making the SIA issue worse.

What do you guys think about option A?
Increasing the metric to the successor can possible allow for some alternative routes to (now) pass the feasibility condition and be marked as feasible successors (so in case of failure no querying will be needed)

@Santana

if a router sends a Query and that Query causes at least one of its directly connected neighbors to also become Active, the router will now become dependent not only on its Active neighbor but also on that neighbor’s own neighbors.

@Santana

When a Query is first sent out by a router, a timer called the Active timer for the route is
started. The default value of the Active timers is 3 minutes and it can be set to any value
between 1 and 65535 minutes or set to infinity using the timers active-time command in
the router eigrp context. If all expected Replies are not received before the Active timer
expires, the route in question will be designated as Stuck-In-Active (SIA).

@Anonymous

I understand the Active timer, however cannnot see any benefit in increasing it. It will only make the route stay in active for a longer period and at the end it will still go into SIA state.

Option A, “Manually increse the EIGRP metrics on interfaces connected to successors”, can, in some cases at least, allow for a feasible successor for a route to be engineered for a route that had no feasible successor. If a route has a feasible successor no querying is done >> no risk of SIA.

@Santana

the question is to prevent route to be SIA and not to prevent diffusing computation for a particular destination

Those who wish to “SPOTO 133Q DUMP” should add their own mail address under the following mailing list and should post.
If you saw this post and you have “SPOTO 133Q DUMP”, please share it.
Thank you.
Compliance with the notation rules.(xxxxx @ yyyyy)
h1740mm @ gmail.com
shijut24 @ gmail.com
satya.maruth @ gmail.com
kamalrajshan @ gmail com
chriswarfreak050697 @ gmail.com
adjustmss @ gmail.com
bahador_gheisari @ yahoo.com
peter_mak @ yahoo.com
tutrij @ gmail.com
empno2000 @ yahoo.com
1529890217 @ qq.com
sanpay1984 @ gmail.com
smartfix123 @ gmail.com
dorocoll77 @ gmail.com
trullybonga @ yahoo.com
tonykozier44567 @ gmail.com
charles.white64 @ gmx.com
mmacbe79 @ gmail.com
beulsins_sonny@yahoo. fr
ayagaya88 @ gmail.com
chat2rajkumar@ rediffmail.com
F77777f_2004 @hotmail.com
jradnor93 @ gmail.com
mandirooz33 @ yahoo.com
alfredyyyy8 @ gmail.com
deskbucks @ gmail.com
arabicuser @ hotmail.com
idealgur2 @ gmail.com
nguyentan1980 @ gmail.com
{email not allowed}

sandhya.a1213 @ gmail.com

Guys – the 119 question file is similar to the SPOTO 133 dump or is it for SPOTO 120

Those who wish to “SPOTO 133Q DUMP” should add their own mail address under the following mailing list and should post.
If you saw this post and you have “SPOTO 133Q DUMP”, please share it.
Thank you.
Compliance with the notation rules.(xxxxx @ yyyyy)
h1740mm @ gmail.com
shijut24 @ gmail.com
satya.maruth @ gmail.com
orowp1 @gmail.com
kamalrajshan @ gmail com
chriswarfreak050697 @ gmail.com
adjustmss @ gmail.com
bahador_gheisari @ yahoo.com
peter_mak @ yahoo.com
tutrij @ gmail.com
empno2000 @ yahoo.com
1529890217 @ qq.com
sanpay1984 @ gmail.com
smartfix123 @ gmail.com
dorocoll77 @ gmail.com
trullybonga @ yahoo.com
tonykozier44567 @ gmail.com
charles.white64 @ gmx.com
mmacbe79 @ gmail.com
beulsins_sonny@yahoo. fr
ayagaya88 @ gmail.com
chat2rajkumar@ rediffmail.com
F77777f_2004 @hotmail.com
jradnor93 @ gmail.com
mandirooz33 @ yahoo.com
alfredyyyy8 @ gmail.com
deskbucks @ gmail.com
arabicuser @ hotmail.com
idealgur2 @ gmail.com
nguyentan1980 @ gmail.com

Above post looks like a spam

Can you share the latest SPOTO ccie r&s dump with me please.
E-MAIL {email not allowed}

my email is fbhutti out look . com without the gaps

That pr*ck who started sharing the mailing list asking for dumps should die now, along with all who keep posting that s*it preventing normal people from going through relevant questions. Stop begging for f*cking dumps, study, research and then come here to discuss questions instead!

@furcceye: I strongly think the answer is B, because type 4 are flooded towards specific areas only in a uni-directional way and surely are not propagated back to area 0.

@tasneem: It should BD, because VTI are not supported as they provide a routable interface for terminating IPSec tunnels