Share your CCIE v5 Written Experience
Please share with us your experience after taking the CCIE v5 Written exam, your materials, the way you learned, your recommendations… But please DO NOT share any information about the detail of the exam or your personal information, your score, exam date and location, your email…
Note: There are some guys trying to sell workbook, videos or even group buy for CCIE exams in the comment section. Please be careful and double check everything before making your decision. Many of them are scammers and just sell old materials or steal your money.
CCie correct answer on CM-CLass is 2
ip precedecence equals dscp af32
for your next question I Would go for B nhsrp dynamically provides infomration about the spoke routers to the hub and D the hub router uses nhrp to initiae GRE tunnels
Refer to the exhibit.If router R1 sends traffic marked with IP precedence 3
to R2’s Loopback 0 address.Which class would the traffic match on R2’s
Gi1/0 interface?
==> I will go for class-default (this is correctly mentioned in VLAD corrections too, although it is incorrect in SPOTO). Refer here: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus1000/sw/4_0_4_s_v_1_3/qos/configuration/guide/n1000v_qos/n1000v_qos_6dscpval.html which says ip precedence 3 matches with cs3
===
Which two statements about DMVPN with NHRP are true? (Choose two)
==>I will go for AB. D is also correct. But if we see here: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security-vpn/ipsec-negotiation-ike-protocols/41940-dmvpn.html#dyntun under bullet 2, they explicitly state about A. and knowing cisco of their own documentation, i would stick to A to get my answer correct.
Network dummy I stand corrected… its b.. where do I have this mapping of ip prcedence towards dscp from..
thanks @spoto so ans is not class default?
actual in passledr n spoto dumps it is saying CM-CLASS-2 the correct ans
spoto still valid
IP precedence 3 = CS3 = DSCP 24 (used to mark call signalling such as SIP traditionally).
This is important as it DOESNT match DSCP 26 (AF31), DSCP 28 (AF32) or DSCP 30 (AF33).
Since the service policy is being applied on R2 Gi0/1 inbound, it will try to apply the policy map and match traffic based on the classes.
However, since IP precedence 3 doesn’t match any of the configured classes, it will be classified under the ‘all other’ traffic umbrella which is the class default-class.
The answer is therefore B!
host on an Ethernet segment has a different subnet mask than the
default gateway.What can be done to allow it to communicate with
devices outside of this subnet?
A.Configure a static route for the host on the default gateway.
B.Configure a static ARP entry on the default gateway for the host IP
address.
C.Enable gratuitous ARP on the host.
D.Enable proxy ARP on the default gateway.
can ayone tel the correct ans whter it is A or D
What can be done to allow it to communicate with
devices outside of this subnet?
==>Proxy ARP sounds about right.
dears thanks, Anyone having VCE ?
@Ander Kau
Please could you share the complete dumps please and in vce format ????
Thanks
@Ander Kau
Please could you share the complete dumps please and in vce format ????
Thanks
Gents , what is the correct answer
Which statement about Cisco StackWise technology is true?
A. All switches in a stack share configuration and routing information to
behave as a single unit
B. Removing switches can affect stack performance
C. Only the master switch acts as a forwarding processor
D. Every switch in a stack has its own independent …configuration file,
which enables it to become the stack master if the previous master fails
@Andre Kau
why you don’t share the whole dump
@Bitpiece
Very Good!!
@everyone…
Passleader hasn’t updated their dump.. it’s still 1315…
@Jeremy
Been working a bit with 3850 switch stacks at the momemt and here is my opinion:
They operate a distributed forwarding architecture which aims to prevent centralised overload processing on the active master switch – so I think that is C out.
I’ve removed switches from a stack recently and the fabric backplane bandwidth stays at 480g. This is the same in a 2 switch vs a 4 switch stack configuration. So more switches don’t give better dataplane performance than less switches so that is D out.
I know from doing recent stack IOS upgrades that each switch doesn’t have its own configuration file so that is D gone.
Finally I know that instead the stack members share a configuration file and routing via NSF/SSO, so I think A is the smartest answer.
Sorry I meant that is B out for my end point and not D as I wrote.
Should be B for the 2nd point about removing switches affecting stack performance – apologies for my fat fingered lazy typing!
the advantage of stacking unifed mgmt, unifed configuration.. same config stored in flash on all switches in the stack and only the master of the stack is allowed to make changes to it.. (working alot with stacks.. =)
on another note.. I failed today.. and it wasnt probably spotos fault.. more me.. forgetting something very basic.. and getting a blank on it..
was close.. so..so.close.. but still.. kinda shooting myself here in the leg at the moment..
if anyone does have the vce files instead of the damn pds.. for spot or hte pass leader whic was mentioned here.. it would be appreciated..
now I am hoping they dont change to much.. and that next 2 coming weeks wont be as stressing ast the last 3 has been..
I have asked before as well but does anyone know about a decent forum where questions and answers like this can be asked? without it being frowned upon?
@spoto
Come on!
Next will be better!
@ Bitpiece thanks,
dears someone please share the VCE
Thanks
Which statement about the feasible distance in EIGRP is true?
A. It is the maximum metric that should feasibly be considered for
installation in the RIB.
B. It is the smallest metric toward the destination encountered …time the
destination went from Active tp Passive state.
C. It is the metric that is supplied by the best next hop toward the
destination.
D. It is the maximum metric possible based on the maximum hop count
that is allowed.
correct ans plz
@ccie
Correct Answer B
@ CCIE answer C is correct
@jermey sounda like reported distance.
B
Refer to the exhibit…
B. class-default
I think it’s not correct. IP precedence has relationship with af32
https://www.m00nie.com/2010/04/ip-precedence-dscp-and-cos-relationships/
IP precedence 3 I mean
@CCIE
I don’t like A – maximum metric (or infinite metric) is usually used for route poisoning and removal. Plus it should be looking to prefer the route with the minimum metric within the feasibility condition (which basically says: consider a route from a neighbor feasible IF its reported distance to a destination is LESS than my local computed distance to it (to avoid routing loops)).
It’s not C imo as the metric supplied by the best next hop is a computed distance which is only a part of the overall feasible distance.
D is also out imo as the EIGRP metric is based on loop free paths calculated by DUAL and NOT hop count.
That leaves B which sounds right to me. the feasible distance to a vector IS the smallest metric that has passed the feasibility condition since the last time DUAL was actively run, queries were sent, and the topology was agreed upon by distance vector peers – hence the converged passive state.
Passed the exam today
Valid dumps
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6vYNS8cNxA7d3pXVmZ4ajg2ckE
Yeah! Just passed 400-101 with a good score!
As you all know, a lot of new questions:
1. command to disable logging for VTY lines
2. monitors network events and takes automated (EEM)
3. IPv4 feature prevents multicast joins on a per-port basis
4. PfR
5. EIGRP request packets
6. routing protocol not supported with VRF-lite (IS-IS)
7. host address 172.150.100.10/18
8. IPv6 PIM
I just learned the newest PassLeader 400-101 dumps, 100% valid now!
Good Luck!
Passleader 400-101 dumps for your reference: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-ob6L_QjGLpfnRCUEFYcEhWZUw3OGNQY2FUSkptUXBrZDVzeE8zdkJQUERtOUFINDBFQW8
Which extended ping IP header option allows you to specify one or more
hops over which the packets will travel without specifying the full path?
A.verbose
B.loose
C.strict
D.record
correct ans plz
Which extended ping IP header option allows you to specify one or more
hops over which the packets will travel without specifying the full path?
==> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/routing-information-protocol-rip/13730-ext-ping-trace.html#extend_ping says LOOSE
@ Malik & Farukh: congratulations that you both passed the exam.
Which dumps you use ?
Now PL 222 and Spoto are same.
Please advise.
CCIE , LOOSE
@ Ahsan
Recommend to use the passleader 400-101 dumps.
All new Qs were from passleader 400-101 dumps now.
I did it today morning and passed with a good score.
@ Tarawaly. Thanx for your response.
Can you send me the pass leader 400-101 on my email.
engrahsan1990at gmail dot com
Thanx
@ Tarawaly Congrats. can u also send me on lubpervaiz at gmail dot com
@ Tarawaly Congrats. can u also send me on altamasha at gmail dot com
@Tarawaly
Could you share passleader 222 Qs please and in vce format please ?
Thanks
@Tarawaly
Here is my email : beulsins_sonny@yahoo. fr
@ Tarawaly Congrats. Could you please share pass leader 400-101 (bonutiwari @ hotmail dot com)
Guys, can I have a vce file format for either Spoto or PL 222q?
Please send to my email: jlabarintos_0721 @ yahoo dot com dot ph
Refer to the exhibit. What type of IS-IS is configured on R1?
This is a dual IP stack configuration (IP4 & IP6) which is known as single topology due to single SPF requirement, from exhibit you can not tell if is multi-topology or single. Best answer is single topology. Not heard of IS-IS version 2 which maybe referring to multi-topology and new capability in IS-IS IOS 12.2 and later , also keyword multitopology optional but not present
Cleared the test with 9** score, prem dev dumps. Used passleader but it was hell of a bunch of questions then got the prem dev file, thank god it has 130 quesitons in the file. if anyone needs mail me at brandon . stark @ gm . cm
@Bramdon What do you refer about: “prem dev file” Can you share a link with the file ,thank u
please, link for vlad’s corrections
don’t email brandon . stark @ gm . cm ,its a scam . the stuff he sent was garbage ,now my computers all messed up.